TOWN OF MELBOURNE BEACH
MINUTES
TOWN COMMISSION - SPECIAL MEETING
****************************************************************************************************
 MONDAY
October 28, 2002
7:00 p.m.
COMMUNITY CENTER
***********************************************************************************************************************
A special meeting of the Town Commission of the Town of Melbourne Beach, Florida was called to order by 
Mayor Wille at 5:07 p.m. on Monday, October 28, 2002 in the Community Center.  Mayor Wille also led 
the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
Present:  
Mayor Wille
Vice Mayor  Smith
Commissioner Crispen
Commissioner  Walters
Others Present:  
Town Manager Hoskovec
Gordon England, Creech Engineers
Twelve members of the public
Town Clerk Masny
I.      DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING MODIFICATIONS TO THE PELICAN KEY/ANCHOR 
        KEY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
        Mayor Wille stated that staff, Gordon England of Creech Engineers and residents have been working to come to a 
        resolution on the drainage project design as discussed at the October 23, 2002 regular meeting.  Town Manager 
        Hoskovec stated that after the last meeting he talked to residents and met with them along with the engineer, 
        Gordon England and they came up with a redesign of the engineering of the stormwater project and advised that 
        all residents were informed of the changes to the plan and have signed off on these changes.  Town Manager 
        Hoskovec stated that the engineering firm talked with the contractor, who came up with an approximate cost of 
        $30,780.90 to complete the project.  Town Manager Hoskovec stated that he has set aside $33,000.00 in the 
        budget for the project if this is the Town Commission's desire.

        Gordon England, Creech Engineering came forward and explained that he has come up with a solution to the 
        design problems and explained that the new inlets, rather than the swale and flume type design, will be a graded 
        inlet which will be located at the curb and a pipe will go back to a manhole behind the curb line.  Mr. England 
        stated that the manholes will be flush with the ground and the pipes will continue to be behind the curb line, as 
        previously designed.  Mr. England stated that the contractor will be able to match the elevations of the yards as 
        to not leave any depressions.  Mr. England stated that he believes this to be a very workable design, the residents 
        like it, there will not be any problems with the existing permits and the contractor has agreed to avoid the waterline 
        issues in the area.  Mr. England stated that he believes we can move forward with the project.
        Commissioner Crispen asked if this design will be as effective as the previous design?  Mr. England stated that he 
        does not believe there will be any difference in how it will function as the water will still drop through a graded inlet 
        to get to into the exfiltration pipes and the only change is the location.  Mr. England stated that the system should 
        be just as functional as previously designed.

        Mayor Wille asked if the grant agencies will have any problems with the project changes?  Mr. England stated that 
        the agencies gave a flat dollar amount for the project and that the functions of the project will remain the same as 
        presented in the grant package.

        Vice Mayor Smith asked if this design will work with Mr. Stein's property as he has the water line issue?  Mr. 
        England stated it will and that the contractor has assured he will be able to work around the water line issue as 
        the pipe will go over the water line and into the next manhole. 

        Mr. England stated that the contractor has asked for an additional 45 days to complete the project because it will 
        take additional time to get baffle boxes made.  Mr. England advised the homeowners that the street will not be 
        repaired for an additional few weeks if this project moves forward with the new design.

        Commissioner Crispen verified that all residents have agreed to the redesign and that they have signed off on the 
        project.  Mr. England stated that the only signature not obtained was from Mrs. Brown, but he reviewed the project 
        with her and she is agreeable to it.  Mrs. Brown was in the audience and stated that this is correct.

        Mayor Wille stated that the Town Commission was never presented with anything other than the proposal and did
        not have any options presented   Mayor Wille stated that the Town Commission was presented with a resolution to 
        the drainage issues and were under the impression that the original plans were supported by the community.   Mayor 
        Wille assured that the Town projects have always been first class and stated that the Town Commission was not 
        short-changing the residents regarding this project. 

        Mayor Wille asked Mr. England if he is in accordance with the costs supplied by the contractor for the changes to 
        the project?  Mr. England stated he looked at the costs and noted that the contractor is not charging for any down 
        time on the project.  Mr. England stated that the contractor was able to salvage the old inlets and customize them. 

        Mayor Wille opened the meeting up to comments from the public.

        Mr. Metha, 405 Anchor Key commented that during the discussion process, the people who live in neighborhood 
        did not get a sense of the project and how it would affect their yards.  Mr. Metha stated that the Town should think 
        of this in the future and meet with other homeowners at the job sites.  Mr. Metha stated that he was never informed 
        about the telephone and cable lines that the contractor advised they were going to cut through.   Mr. England deferred 
        this to the contractor who advised that the lines may need to be disconnected and rerouted with the installation of 
        pipes or manholes, which is typically one day’s inconvenience.  Mayor Wille asked that Town staff help contact 
        the residents if a telephone or cable line needs to be disconnected during this project.

        Vickie Freece, 408 Anchor Key thanked the Town Manager, Mr. England and the Town Commission for listening to 
        the residents' concerns regarding this project and for making Melbourne Beach a great place to live.

        Commissioner Walters asked where in the budget the additional funding is coming from for this project?  Mayor Wille 
        stated that the funding will come from the Stormwater Utilities line item, 538-6300-41 Stormwater Permit NPEDS and 
        the Town will transfer these funds to the line item 538-5320-41, the Drainage Project - Anchor, Pelican Key with the 
        understanding that these funds shall be restored to their appropriate line item when the stormwater utility is fiscally 
        capable of performing that function.  

        COMMISSIONER WALTERS MOVED, SECOND VICE MAYOR SMITH TO APPROVE THE DESIGN MODIFICATIONS 
        TO THE PELICAN KEY/ANCHOR KEY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AS PRESENTED UNDER REVISION 
        NUMBER TWO (2) UP TO $33,000.  
        VOTE:  ALL AYES.  MOTION CARRIED.

II.     ADJOURNMENT
        COMMISSIONER CRISPEN MOVED, SECOND VICE MAYOR SMITH TO ADJOURN.  
        VOTE:  ALL AYES.  MOTION CARRIED.

The special meeting of the Town Commission of the Town of Melbourne Beach, Florida adjourned at 5:53 p.m.
____________________________________
ROBERT D. WILLE, MAYOR




____________________________________
CYNTHIA E. MASNY, CMC
TOWN CLERK


 Note:  a mechanical recording has been made of the foregoing procedures of which these minutes are a 
           part and is on file in the office of the Town Clerk.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 286.0105, FLORIDA STATUTES, THE TOWN HEREBY 
ADVISES THE PUBLIC THAT: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the 
Town Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting, he will need a 
record of the proceedings and that for such purpose, affected persons may need to insure 
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony 
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.  This notice does not constitute 
consent by the Town for the introduction or admission into evidence of otherwise 
inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not 
otherwise allowed by law.